Posted
If understand it correct .. i do have container and nested a another container inside ..that is the maximum nesting of containers?
Right now i am in de arrangement view setting up ..songsection.. i collapse the songsection container and the content (instruments)containers are showing up.
By structuring a arrangement on this way i loose one not musical container ( the names of the songsections )
Now there is no nesting anymore possible in the songsections containers..while 2 nested container is the standard feature in SFE.
Can this be chanced that a empty container (naming songsection container) is not to be considered as a rootcontainer for a another container nested in this rootcontainer?
On this way i preserve the 2-nested container feature in SFE..thanks
I loose one nested container level by using songsection name containers ..?
Or do i miss something?
Mon, 2012-10-22 - 21:54 Permalink
Thanks!
Ofcourse ..obviously .. why i did make a test for this? ( i already make a small testarrangement)
I think i got on the wrong leg , because a songsection is normally only a marker.
The example demo arrangment don't show a example with songsection , has this been the case than i had noticed that in the songsection container sits a instrument.
I studied also the video and no flash of insight for the songsection container.
Well its clear now..