Confused about harmony inheritance

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
AndreasHe's picture
AndreasHe
Offline
Last seen 11 months 1 day ago

Confused about harmony inheritance

Can you maybe have a look onto my screenshots.

I tried to have ONE harmony which shall be inherited to "the grandeur". But I does not sound like and somehow in "the grandeur" it shows me grey "Db | C". What is wrong with my box-arangement and? Shouldn't be in that track in grey the harmony of the first block?

 

AndreasHe's picture
AndreasHe
Offline
Last seen 11 months 1 day ago

Ok, somehow in a container was a progression, which was invisible as the length was reduced to 0.

Did not get it fixed. But I created a new song and copy/pasted all required parts in and did a different container arrangement.

I am not so used regarding containers and nested container. Usability, what is shown confuses me often. Hope to get used to it by time.

Also not sure if it is a good idea to add the progression to the top-container?

andre's picture
andre
Offline
Last seen 5 days 18 hours ago

If you end up with a zero-length parameter, its green LED will still be lit. To remove the parameter, select that LED and press DELETE (or use the "Delete" button on the parameter inspector).

Also not sure if it is a good idea to add the progression to the top-container

Yes, why not. Only if you sync with a DAW, I would leave 1m space at the beginning for recording, but otherwise it's ok to start with the root container.

Once you do a real arrangement (as opposed to experimenting), it is best practice however to have one container per part of your song and then fill those with stuff. Easier to move parts around then.

 

Log in or register to post comments

Scholarly Lite is a free theme, contributed to the Drupal Community by More than Themes.